[rabbitmq-discuss] STOMP plugin - durable subscription limitation

Emile Joubert emile at rabbitmq.com
Tue Oct 23 11:18:11 BST 2012

On 23/10/12 09:27, Michael Justin wrote:
> This is interesting - so the behavior of the broker is not undefined, 
> and clients could implement load balancing with durable subscribers if 
> they all use the same subscription ID (instead of using STOMP queues), 
> is this correct (just curious)?

Yes, I don't see anything preventing it being used in that way.


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list