[rabbitmq-discuss] immediate, mandatory flag with no consumers

Fri May 4 10:33:11 BST 2012

Hi,

On 04/05/12 05:19, Unni, Monish wrote:
> * is it okay to pair request-reply channels and use the same
> connection to provide "maximum" concurrency?

It is okay to send and receive messages on the same connection. Bear in
mind that if the broker decides to block the connection then all
channels in that connection will be affected. I'm not sure you will
achieve higher concurrency this way.

> * how can we get this feature working for "C" clients ( C- api ) ?

Have you taken a look at the C client examples?

> * and last : is my understanding right ( from observation ) that the
> request channel and reply-channels have to share the same connection
> for this feature to work?

In general requests and their corresponding replies do not have to share
a connection, but for basic.return to work the return handler must share
a channel with the publisher.

-Emile