[rabbitmq-discuss] Federation with Clusters and Load Balancers

James Carr james.r.carr at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 18:30:20 GMT 2012

One more question... is it possible to define an alternate exchange
for the downstream exchange? Currently I have upstream exchanges that
any number of message types can be published to  and I'd like a "catch
all" for the downstream when messages don't get routed.


On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:06 AM, James Carr <james.r.carr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>> On 19/03/12 14:43, James Carr wrote:
>>> Is there a good solution to this? it seems like it might work if there
>>> was someway for each of the 4 nodes to just use the same queue on the
>>> upstream broker since they are logically part of the same group.
>> Check out the local_nodename configuration item. Although the documentation
>> could probably do with mentioning its usefulness for clustering....
>> http://www.rabbitmq.com/federation.html#configuration
>> Cheers, Simon
>> --
>> Simon MacMullen
>> RabbitMQ, VMware

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list