[rabbitmq-discuss] Can RabbitMQ handle big messages?

Mon Mar 12 16:23:59 GMT 2012

On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Matthew Sackman wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:42:52PM +0100, Zabrane Mickael wrote:
>> It's not a bug. You have to be aware of it to build reliable systems in case of multiple connected Erlang nodes.
> 
> For those of us struggling to follow this, if you're currently in the
> act of receiving data from node X, why can't you assume node X is still
> alive? I.e. what is wrong with treating arbitrary data from node X as
> evidence it's still alive, in lieu of a heartbeat from node X?

http://learnyousomeerlang.com/distribunomicon

Regards,
Zabrane

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120312/ad5e3cce/attachment.htm>