[rabbitmq-discuss] Can RabbitMQ handle big messages?
zabrane3 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 15:42:52 GMT 2012
It's not a bug. You have to be aware of it to build reliable systems in case of multiple connected Erlang nodes.
On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 08:51, Irmo Manie <irmo.manie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Clustered nodes are connected via 1 tcp connection, which must also
> transport a (erlang) heartbeat. If your big message takes more time to
> transfer between nodes than the heartbeat timeout (anywhere between
> ~20-45 seconds if I'm correct), the cluster will break and your
> message is lost.
> Wow! Is that really the case? Erlang's distribution breaks if no heartbeats have been received *even if there's traffic coming in on the wire*? Sounds like an Erlang bug. Or perhaps there's some subtlety in the design I'm not seeing!
> Tony Garnock-Jones
> tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss