[rabbitmq-discuss] Shovel questions

[Simon MacMullen]

On 24/01/12 18:05, Elias Levy wrote:
> I am curious as to whether this helps at all with binding churn.  I know
> its recommended to long term bindings to avoid binding churn, but this
> is often not possible, as a client may need to change its bindings
> dynamically.  Would making use private client exchange, creating the
> dynamic bindings against it, and the creating the single e2e binding
> help with binding churn?

No, it's still the same underlying operation. Of course "avoid binding 
churn" is just a special case of "avoid unnecessary work" - if the work 
is necessary you can't avoid it...

Cheers, Simon

-- 
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, VMware