[rabbitmq-discuss] Shovel questions
simon at rabbitmq.com
Wed Jan 25 11:13:59 GMT 2012
On 24/01/12 18:05, Elias Levy wrote:
> I am curious as to whether this helps at all with binding churn. I know
> its recommended to long term bindings to avoid binding churn, but this
> is often not possible, as a client may need to change its bindings
> dynamically. Would making use private client exchange, creating the
> dynamic bindings against it, and the creating the single e2e binding
> help with binding churn?
No, it's still the same underlying operation. Of course "avoid binding
churn" is just a special case of "avoid unnecessary work" - if the work
is necessary you can't avoid it...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss