[rabbitmq-discuss] Is it possible that group clustering nodes shovel/federate with other group clustering nodes
jerryk at vmware.com
Wed Jan 11 16:09:32 GMT 2012
There are very clear and friendly discussions of setting up clusters and shovel
in this book, of which a preview eBook edition is currently available (the print
book should hit the stands sometime around March):
It does not, however, cover the Federation plugin. For that you'll have to look
at the Rabbit web site.
The following links are from RabbitMQ's own web site:
For clustering Rabbit: http://www.rabbitmq.com/clustering.html
For Federation: http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2011/06/22/federation-plugin-preview-release/
And for Shovel: http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-shovel/file/default/README
It might require a bit more thought about your specific application to clinch
the decision between Federation and Shovel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yican Cao - 0661 - MITLL" <cao at ll.mit.edu>
To: "Jerry Kuch" <jerryk at vmware.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 6:31:42 AM
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] Is it possible that group clustering nodes shovel/federate with other group clustering nodes
Thanks for answer my email promptly.
Yes, you're correct. That is exactly what I try to do.
Is there any example or document I can follow?
On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Jerry Kuch wrote:
> Hi, Yican...
> If I understand your intentions correctly, you're proposing a use
> case that's quite commonly done, namely the clustering of nodes within
> a geographic location for increasing throughput, or perhaps HA, and
> then setting up Federation or Shovel to span the long hauls between
> your geographic locations. This, plus judiciously picking which messages
> you plan to move between sites is the essence of the sort of WAN
> distribution you're after.
> Best regards,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yican Cao - 0661 - MITLL" <cao at ll.mit.edu>
> To: rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:03:44 PM
> Subject: [rabbitmq-discuss] Is it possible that group clustering nodes shovel/federate with other group clustering nodes
> I have a crazy idea:
> 1. clustering 3 nodes with HAQ (highly available queue) as group A.
> 2. clustering other 2 nodes with HAQ as group B.
> 3. federating/shoveling group A and group B with 1 or 2 exchange.
> Group A and B will connect via WAN, so clustering is not recommended by RabbitMQ.
> Is it possible? If so, has anyone done this?
> Thanks a lot.
> Yican Cao
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss