[rabbitmq-discuss] Help needed for .NET API for RabbitMQ.

[Eugene Kirpichov]

Hi Bikram,

Why don't you place the deduplication on producer side? E.g. consumer sends
back messages that the task has been processed, and the producer only puts
the task into the queue if the last one has already been processed.

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Bikram Bhuyan <bikrambhuyan at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> I need some help in my below requirement for implementing RabbitMQ for
> .NET. Could you please help me in providing right pointer to API which can
> be used to achieve this task.
>
> 1. I am right now working on a batch process in C# .net with RabbitMQ as
> the communication channel.
>
> 2. I have one producer which runs every 15 minutes and put the request to
> the queue with the TaskId (Say 12345) to the Queue.
>
> 3. My consumer takes the TaskId from the queue and process the other logic.
>
> The consumer normally takes a lot of time to complete the task around 30
> minutes or more, as it is a batch process which do a lot of activities. So
> a lot of request are added to the queue by producer modules. So I am having
> a lot of back logs for the same task id (12345) over a period of time.
>
> So I wanted to implement the logic that if the message (12345) already
> exists in the queue (not processed completely) I don’t wanted to add it to
> the queue for this id (12345). Could you please send me the details of the
> API calls which will give me the list of messages in a queue so that I can
> have my own logic to check if the message already exists.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bikram.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>


-- 
Eugene Kirpichov
Principal Engineer, Mirantis Inc. http://www.mirantis.com/
Editor, http://fprog.ru/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120107/bb3e6e46/attachment.htm>