[rabbitmq-discuss] Consuming ack transactional without txCommit() ?

[Tim Watson]

John,

I tried to answer this in my reply to your other post: see 
http://rabbitmq.1065348.n5.nabble.com/Can-no-longer-start-RabbitMQ-service-td23954.html 
- note that the thread's title doesn't make much sense because of topic 
switching.

Please shout if it still isn't making sense!

Cheers,
Tim

On 12/18/2012 07:24 PM, John Smith wrote:
> What does it mean that the ack is transacted on consuming side, but 
> not the read.
> I do get the fact that I can not write a rollback.  What I do not 
> understand is what it means that the ack is trasactional.
> Does tis mean the act will not complete until the server deletes the 
> message, and therefore the rollback is no longer permitted ?
> In the examples, I do not see a txCommmit() on the consuming side.
> Do I have to put a txCommit (and txselect) on the consuming side in 
> order to have the ack be transactional ?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20121219/2c8b621f/attachment.htm>