[rabbitmq-discuss] Consuming ack transactional without txCommit() ?
tim at rabbitmq.com
Wed Dec 19 11:50:13 GMT 2012
I tried to answer this in my reply to your other post: see
- note that the thread's title doesn't make much sense because of topic
Please shout if it still isn't making sense!
On 12/18/2012 07:24 PM, John Smith wrote:
> What does it mean that the ack is transacted on consuming side, but
> not the read.
> I do get the fact that I can not write a rollback. What I do not
> understand is what it means that the ack is trasactional.
> Does tis mean the act will not complete until the server deletes the
> message, and therefore the rollback is no longer permitted ?
> In the examples, I do not see a txCommmit() on the consuming side.
> Do I have to put a txCommit (and txselect) on the consuming side in
> order to have the ack be transactional ?
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss