[rabbitmq-discuss] STOMP & message-id
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Mon Aug 22 11:00:10 BST 2011
On 22/08/11 10:56, Lionel Cons wrote:
> So in this case I think that RabbitMQ should overwrite any message-id
> it receives so that the messages that it later sends can be acknowledged.
> Don't you think so?
Yes. I think you'll find that currently there are *two* message-ids in
the MESSAGE frame - the original and Rabbit's. I will file a bug to get
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss