[rabbitmq-discuss] Broker to Broker communication...
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Mon Aug 9 19:04:20 BST 2010
Chris Chew wrote:
>Jeff Bannister wrote:
>> App B--->Exchange A-->Queue-->Exchange B-->Queue-->App A
> With shovel, the flow would look more like this:
> [ ......... Broker A .......... ] [ ..... Broker B ..... ]
> App B --> Exchange A --> Queue A --> Shovel -+WAN+-> Exchange B --> Queue --> App B
rabbitmq-shovel is certainly one option. But do you actually need two
brokers in the first place? Why not co-locate the broker with either the
sending or the receiving side?
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss