[rabbitmq-discuss] Exactly Once Delivery
sustrik at 250bpm.com
Sun Aug 8 11:30:04 BST 2010
Alexis Richardson wrote:
>> Quantum mechanics may offer a way to avoid messages ever being lost, but
>> I suspect that's probably not going to be sorted out in time for
>> RabbitMQ 3.0.
> This would be renamed QbitMQ. Delivery would be determined by opening
> a box. No bunnies would be harmed in this experiment.
If message is missing, try to guess what was that the sender intended to
send. Deliver it to the receiver. If it turns out later on that the
guess was incorrect, cancel the transaction. Additional advantage is
that you can get negative latencies this way.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss