scott.brooks at epicadvertising.com
Wed Sep 30 16:52:11 BST 2009
On 2009-09-30, at 11:44 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
Scott Brooks wrote:
I guess option D is revisiting ruby-ffi and trying to get the pass
value code working, which looks to be the route I'll try and take.
Yep. I'd be *reasonably* happy supporting a parallel API for some of the
operations -- but it really only works well for the simple ones
(amqp_bytes_t). The complex ones will no doubt require special handling
And the Lazyweb wins again. ruby-ffi was updated a few months ago to support
passing structs by value. Problem solved!
Thanks for the C-library, chances are once I get the wrapper going with the lastest
ruby-ffi there will be another ruby amqp library in the mix.
 Tony Garnock-Jones | Mob: +44 (0)7905 974 211
 LShift Ltd | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
  http://www.lshift.net/ | Email: tonyg at lshift.net<mailto:tonyg at lshift.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss