[rabbitmq-discuss] opposite of basicAck?

Ben Hood 0x6e6562 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 23:57:52 BST 2009


On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM, tsuraan<tsuraan at gmail.com> wrote:
> If I have a message that I know that I don't want to handle right now,
> is there something like basicAck that rejects a deliveryTag instead of
> acking it?  IIRC, after some timeout, or a channel close, the message
> will be queued for redelivery, but I have a case where I know that a
> message I received isn't useful for me yet, so I'd like to immediately
> reject it so I can pick it up later.  Is that possible?

0-8 rejections, were Rabbit to implement them, are scoped on a
channel. Just nuking the channel and letting them get consumed on a
different channel has the same effect.


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list