[rabbitmq-discuss] Durable exchanges

[Valentino Volonghi]

On Jan 12, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Matthias Radestock wrote:

> There is a difference between durable and non-durable exchanges. The  
> former survive a broker restart. The latter don't.

Sure, but as I showed in the post I didn't see the difference but I  
was probably
doing something wrong.

> amqp_channel:call(Channel, #'exchange.declare'{exchange = Name,
>                                               durable = true}).
>
> That's pretty easy, isn't it?

Well... Yes, it's just annoying because then I need to replicate this  
call in every
place where I need a durable exchange and it would be a lot easier if  
it was part
of the client api (I attached patches for the stuff that I needed in  
this ML, and I see
that part of the things are already there in the recent client  
revisions).

> Could you perhaps start from a clean RabbitMQ instance, run the  
> above through the tracer (http://www.rabbitmq.com/ 
> examples.html#tracer) and post the output (along with the complete  
> code you ran)? That way we can tell whether the it's the client or  
> the server that is at fault here.


I don't really have java setup here (and I don't even know how to set  
it up to be honest,
I'm happy without knowing java) so it would take a considerable effort  
to do so... it's
definitely possible that it's an error on my side so I wouldn't worry.

-- 
Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone
Now running MacOS X 10.5
Home Page: http://www.twisted.it
http://www.adroll.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20090112/bea9c57f/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20090112/bea9c57f/attachment.pgp