[rabbitmq-discuss] Monitoring Question

[Jason J. W. Williams]

I'll take a look into this. Was hoping not to have to install Erlang
on the monitoring server as would be required for rabbitmqctl.

-J

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
> <jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry...HC=healthcheck. Will probably end up scripting
>> rabbitmqctl...just hate output scraping. :-)
>
> Sure, but this is the Unix way (sort, uniq, cut).
>
> If you'd rather apply higher order functions, I suggest you look at
> the underlying Erlang API - this is semantically the same as a pipe,
> except that you have a more structured access to the data you're
> working with.
>
> Ben
>