[rabbitmq-discuss] Erlang client and properties

Sat Nov 8 16:09:00 GMT 2008

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Matthias
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Matthias Radestock <matthias at lshift.net>
> wrote:
> > Ben Hood wrote:
> >  > I'll let Matthias answer these questions as he is reviewing the
> >  > upcoming 0.9.1 spec.
> >
> > Err, thanks. 0-9-1 doesn't actually answer most of these, though some
> > did come up during the 0-10 discussions.
>
> This is exactly the answer I wanted to give Edwin ;-)
>
> The reason being is it gives somebody who starts reading the current
> spec an impression of why AMQP is not 1.0 yet - not only because of
> directional issues but because of the many bugs in the spec.
>

Thanks a lot, guys. This really helps.

>
> The astute reader may then ask why we are not using 0-10 if it
> apparently clarifies points in 0-8/0-9/0-9-1 :-)
>

Ok, then... why are you not using 0-10? :)

> Ben

Regards,
Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20081108/a4093f3d/attachment.htm 