<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Ben Hood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:0x6e6562@gmail.com">0x6e6562@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Matthias<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Matthias Radestock <<a href="mailto:matthias@lshift.net">matthias@lshift.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Ben Hood wrote:<br>
> > I'll let Matthias answer these questions as he is reviewing the<br>
> > upcoming 0.9.1 spec.<br>
><br>
> Err, thanks. 0-9-1 doesn't actually answer most of these, though some<br>
> did come up during the 0-10 discussions.<br>
<br>
</div>This is exactly the answer I wanted to give Edwin ;-)<br>
<br>
The reason being is it gives somebody who starts reading the current<br>
spec an impression of why AMQP is not 1.0 yet - not only because of<br>
directional issues but because of the many bugs in the spec.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Thanks a lot, guys. This really helps.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
The astute reader may then ask why we are not using 0-10 if it<br>
apparently clarifies points in 0-8/0-9/0-9-1 :-)<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br>Ok, then... why are you not using 0-10? :)<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<font color="#888888"><br>
Ben</font></blockquote><div><br>Regards,<br>Ed <br></div></div><br>