[rabbitmq-discuss] Channel crashes after basic.cancel_ok.

[Ben Hood]

Ed,

On 8 May 2008, at 21:11, Ben Hood wrote:
>
> On 8 May 2008, at 15:04, Edwin Fine wrote:
>> Thanks for looking into this. In the "real" code, all the setup is  
>> actually done within a single Erlang process, and the only thing  
>> the consumers do is handle the basic.deliver, as well as any  
>> basic.consume_ok  or basic.cancel_ok messages that may arise. In  
>> the test code, I rearranged some things specifically to be done  
>> concurrently, which I now see was a mistake. However, this is a bug  
>> in the test code, not in the production code. I will change the  
>> test code so that there is no concurrent work being done on a  
>> channel other than responding with basic.ack to basic.deliver  
>> messages.
>
> I've begun a discussion on this topic and it looks like we will add  
> the intelligence to the amqp_channel module to be able to serialize  
> concurrent RPC requests to the channel. I understand that you have a  
> workaround anyway, but on reflection, it seems like a good idea to  
> put this capability into the client. will let you know when it is  
> done.

This feature is now implemented in the trunk of the repo. There is  
also a test case to test the serialization of concurrent RPC requests.

I will now look into the next 2 issues you raised.

BTW, I am also in the process of moving the mtn repo to hg, so this  
might happen very soon as well.

HTH,

Ben