[rabbitmq-discuss] Erlang client: function_clause error

[Edwin Fine]

Thanks for the info, Ben.

One more question: Without using transactions, is there a way to
basic.publish using a call (and getting either a positive or negative
response from the server), rather than just doing a "blind" cast? I think we
talked about this but I can't fully  recall the conclusion. IIRC, you said
you would add a call for it?

Regards,
Ed

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ed,
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Edwin Fine
> > <rabbitmq-discuss_efine at usa.net> wrote:
> >> Music to my ears. I would really, really appreciate something like that.
> >
> > Ok, I've roadmapped it for consideration in the 1.0 release of the
> > Erlang client (when a patch transpires 19630 will refer).
>
> I forgot to mention the other day that the handling for this has been
> updated with the latest mainline.
>
> It is known as 19625 and basically handles a forced connection more
> gracefully.
>
> It still doesn't contain a shutdown handler, which will be in a
> seperate branch (19630) when something gets done on this.
>
> Ben
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20081210/d46d9fb9/attachment.htm