Thanks for the info, Ben.<br><br>One more question: Without using transactions, is there a way to basic.publish using a call (and getting either a positive or negative response from the server), rather than just doing a "blind" cast? I think we talked about this but I can't fully recall the conclusion. IIRC, you said you would add a call for it?<br>
<br>Regards,<br>Ed<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Ben Hood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:0x6e6562@gmail.com">0x6e6562@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Ed,<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ben Hood <<a href="mailto:0x6e6562@gmail.com">0x6e6562@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Edwin Fine<br>
> <<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss_efine@usa.net">rabbitmq-discuss_efine@usa.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Music to my ears. I would really, really appreciate something like that.<br>
><br>
> Ok, I've roadmapped it for consideration in the 1.0 release of the<br>
> Erlang client (when a patch transpires 19630 will refer).<br>
<br>
</div></div>I forgot to mention the other day that the handling for this has been<br>
updated with the latest mainline.<br>
<br>
It is known as 19625 and basically handles a forced connection more gracefully.<br>
<br>
It still doesn't contain a shutdown handler, which will be in a<br>
seperate branch (19630) when something gets done on this.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Ben<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>