[rabbitmq-discuss] Flow control behavior
mklishin at gopivotal.com
Mon Apr 21 18:45:46 BST 2014
On 21 April 2014 at 20:45:45, Jason McIntosh (mcintoshj at gmail.com) wrote:
> > Was there ever a time where flow control was based upon consumer
> rate not queue rates?
There is flow control based on various Erlang processes (including queues, protocol reader
and consumers) not keeping up with the messages that are being sent to them. This
flow control is temporary, while resource-based can lead to publishers being blocked
for a longer time (until resource alarms clear).
Does this answer your question?
Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss