[rabbitmq-discuss] Federated Cluster Issue

Wed Apr 24 23:54:52 BST 2013

Chris,

Thank you - that error in the URI was the results at my attempts at
obfuscation. I am indeed referencing the vhost on the remote cluster.

Could you clarify this remark: "you will not actually see the links until
the exchanges you are federating actually exist on the upstream host"?

I ask because based on my understanding is that the URI defines the remote
system, username, password, and vhost - while the policy defines the local
exchange to be associated with the link. Am I misunderstanding this (e.g.
is the policy actually defining the remote exchange to be federated in a
"pull" relationship?).

Regards,

Richard

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Chris <stuff at moesel.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Richard Raseley <richard at raseley.com>wrote:
>
>> 3) Added a new upstream on each cluster pointing to the other with a URI
>> that looks similar to the following (from the perspective of "cluster-01":
>>
>> amqp://user:pass@cluster-02.domain.local/cluster02.exchange
>>
>
> You might also want to double-check the url you are using to setup the
> federation-upstream.  The URL above corresponds to a *virtual host* called
> "cluster02.exchange".  Is this what you really intended?  If you are
> actually using the default virtual host, then you should just use
> amqp://user:pass@cluster-02.domain.local/ and setup policies for the
> exchanges you wish to federate (as in your step 4).
>
> One other thing to note-- you will not actually see the links until the
> exchanges you are federating actually exist on the upstream host.  So if
> you haven't yet created the exchanges, you'll want to do that too.
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130424/f8d1f0d4/attachment.htm>