[rabbitmq-discuss] Problems getting reply_to to work
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Sun Sep 30 14:13:33 BST 2012
On 30/09/12 13:56, Robert Buck wrote:
> Yes, "immediate" was cribbed from the sample code, as was much of the
> code I put together, well, at least the concepts were cribbed that is.
Could you post a link to the sample code, please, so that Michael can
remove the use of 'immediate' from it?
> So I should yank immediate?
Yes, but that has nothing to do with the problem you were seeing.
> I am not sure why 'response_queue.subscribe' doesn't trigger the setting
> of the name. It's rather weird in that regard, neither the client nor
> the server see the generated queue name. I would be guessing that the
> Ruby amqp gem is broken in this regard?
'broken' might be a bit harsh, 'surprising' perhaps ;) Anyway, this is
one for Michael.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss