[rabbitmq-discuss] Problems getting reply_to to work

[Matthias Radestock]

Robert,

On 30/09/12 13:56, Robert Buck wrote:
> Yes, "immediate" was cribbed from the sample code, as was much of the
> code I put together, well, at least the concepts were cribbed that is.

Could you post a link to the sample code, please, so that Michael can 
remove the use of 'immediate' from it?

> So I should yank immediate?

Yes, but that has nothing to do with the problem you were seeing.

> I am not sure why 'response_queue.subscribe' doesn't trigger the setting
> of the name. It's rather weird in that regard, neither the client nor
> the server see the generated queue name. I would be guessing that the
> Ruby amqp gem is broken in this regard?

'broken' might be a bit harsh, 'surprising' perhaps ;) Anyway, this is 
one for Michael.

Regards,

Matthias.