[rabbitmq-discuss] Many vhosts with fewer exchanges per vhost, or one vhost with many exchanges?
simon at rabbitmq.com
Sat Sep 22 11:12:38 BST 2012
On 21/09/2012 8:06PM, Alex Gadea wrote:
> From a performance and resource viewpoint, is it better to have many
> vhosts (100s) with 1 or 2 exchanges each or have a handful of vhosts
> with 100s of exchanges per vhost. Or does it not matter?
It doesn't matter. Vhosts only really exist as security contexts, they
don't have any performance implications.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss