[rabbitmq-discuss] Many vhosts with fewer exchanges per vhost, or one vhost with many exchanges?

• Previous message: [rabbitmq-discuss] Many vhosts with fewer exchanges per vhost, or one vhost with many exchanges?
• Next message: [rabbitmq-discuss] 30% performance degradation with user access controls enabled
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 21/09/2012 8:06PM, Alex Gadea wrote:
>  From a performance and resource viewpoint, is it better to have many
> vhosts (100s) with 1 or 2 exchanges each or have a handful of vhosts
> with 100s of exchanges per vhost.  Or does it not matter?

It doesn't matter. Vhosts only really exist as security contexts, they 
don't have any performance implications.

Cheers, Simon

• Previous message: [rabbitmq-discuss] Many vhosts with fewer exchanges per vhost, or one vhost with many exchanges?
• Next message: [rabbitmq-discuss] 30% performance degradation with user access controls enabled
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]