[rabbitmq-discuss] Many vhosts with fewer exchanges per vhost, or one vhost with many exchanges?

[Simon MacMullen]

On 21/09/2012 8:06PM, Alex Gadea wrote:
>  From a performance and resource viewpoint, is it better to have many
> vhosts (100s) with 1 or 2 exchanges each or have a handful of vhosts
> with 100s of exchanges per vhost.  Or does it not matter?

It doesn't matter. Vhosts only really exist as security contexts, they 
don't have any performance implications.

Cheers, Simon