[rabbitmq-discuss] Memory watermark alert not resetting.
Simon MacMullen
simon at rabbitmq.com
Thu Oct 4 17:17:17 BST 2012
On 04/10/12 16:57, Raviv Pavel wrote:
> Back to the original problem:
> 1. I set the watermark very low so I can reach it, effectively 78MB
Ah. Was this what you had done in the first place?
> 2. server starts with empty queues and memory usage is 66MB
> 3. I start publishing messages and reach the watermark
> 4. publisher gets blocked
> 5. I purge the queue but memory stays the same
When you set the watermark very low, close to the "empty" memory use, it
is very possible that the memory level will go over and never go under
again. Caches, lazy instantiation and so on. RabbitMQ is not designed
for highly constrained memory environments.
Cheers. Simon
--
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, VMware
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list