[rabbitmq-discuss] basic_nack support in 0.8

[Alvaro Videla]

Well. I'm more a maintainer of that lib. And now some ppl need nack so...

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 01/11/12 14:23, Alvaro Videla wrote:
>> Is there a reason why basic_nack was not added to the 0.8 spec?
> 
> We haven't modified the 0-8 spec at all. Our thinking was that any client that was stuck on 0-8 was unlikely to get the attention needed to add support for new features.
> 
>> The php-amqplib client most people uses requires 0.8
> 
> That should really change!
> 
>> I played with adding basic_nack
>> to rabbitmq-codegen/amqp-rabbitmq-0.8.json and it seem to work with very
>> simple tests.
>> 
>> On a separate note, is there a migration guide for 0.8 clients to 0.9.1 ?
> 
> It should just be a matter of swapping out the protocol spec file used by your codegen.
> 
> *goes and looks at php-amqplib*
> 
> Ah. That looks like it's not using any codegen. I would still suggest moving to 0-9-1. It should not be very hard.
> 
>> Did the wire format changed from one version to the other?
> 
> A little bit. Some of the class / method numbers changed, and some methods gained or lost properties. But again, this shouldn't be a huge deal.
> 
> Cheers, Simon
> 
> -- 
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware