[rabbitmq-discuss] Highly Available Cluster

[steve layland]

Simon, just curious... has this always been the case for older versions of
rabbitmq? Thanks

-Steve
On May 21, 2012 4:27 AM, "Simon MacMullen" <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 21/05/12 12:21, rui.favas at barclays.com wrote:
>
>> Its actually the other way around…. Starting server1 always appears to
>> work even when server2 is down!! but I cannot start server2 without
>> starting server1 first.
>>
>
> If you stop server2 then stop server1, then you will need to start server1
> first. You always need to first start the last node to shut down.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
> ______________________________**_________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.**rabbitmq.com<rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**rabbitmq-discuss<https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120521/7859ec24/attachment.htm>