<p>Simon, just curious... has this always been the case for older versions of rabbitmq? Thanks </p>
<p>-Steve</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 21, 2012 4:27 AM, "Simon MacMullen" <<a href="mailto:simon@rabbitmq.com">simon@rabbitmq.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 21/05/12 12:21, <a href="mailto:rui.favas@barclays.com" target="_blank">rui.favas@barclays.com</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Its actually the other way around…. Starting server1 always appears to<br>
work even when server2 is down!! but I cannot start server2 without<br>
starting server1 first.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
If you stop server2 then stop server1, then you will need to start server1 first. You always need to first start the last node to shut down.<br>
<br>
Does that make sense?<br>
<br>
Cheers, Simon<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Simon MacMullen<br>
RabbitMQ, VMware<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.<u></u>rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div>