[rabbitmq-discuss] upgrade to MPL 2.0 ?

Brent Smithurst brents at activestate.com
Tue Jul 17 17:30:51 BST 2012

Has there been any movement on this? What options are available if the MPL 
1.1 license simply is not acceptable for a project, but MPL 2.0 is?



On Monday, March 5, 2012 9:34:52 AM UTC-8, RubyTuesdayDONO wrote:
> thanks, Alexis and Simon, for responding.
> there's no pressure from my end, and i appreciate your being open to
> the consideration regardless of whether it can be implemented soon or
> at all.  i just wanted to raise awareness between the Apache Camel and
> RabbitMQ communities in case the licensing issue was not a foregone
> conclusion after all.
> best regards,
> Reuben Garrett
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120717/dd0620cf/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list