[rabbitmq-discuss] Database lag and delayed processing of messages

Thu Jan 19 21:03:27 GMT 2012

It shouldn't be too bard to write a client which does the scheduling, I
think Mike Hadlow did something similar in his .NET library EasyNetQ.
On Jan 19, 2012 7:01 PM, "Mark" <static.void.dev at gmail.com> wrote:

> Are there any alternative methods/workarounds for these type of problems?
>
> Also is there any documentation out there on the dead-letter queue?
>
> On 1/19/12 9:30 AM, Simon MacMullen wrote:
>
>> On 19/01/12 17:25, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> Is there anyway I could configure an exchange/queue/consumer to
>>> route/deliver/consume a message in the future?
>>>
>>> For example we have run into a situation whereas we produce a message
>>> for a record that was just inserted into our master database. When our
>>> consumer tries to act upon this message the record has not be replicated
>>> to the slaves yet so the message consumption fails. Is there any way we
>>> can queue up this message in say 5 seconds? Of course we could always
>>> requeue a failed consumed message but that would lead us to a situation
>>> where the we could be consume/producing in an infinite loop. How do
>>> people typically handle this situation?
>>>
>>
>> Not right now.
>>
>> In the near future we hope to have dead lettering. When that happens you
>> could publish to a queue with a 5 second message TTL, and have that queue
>> dead letter to the "real" queue.
>>
>> But not yet I'm afraid.
>>
>> Cheers, Simon
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.**rabbitmq.com<rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**rabbitmq-discuss<https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120119/b8e990c3/attachment.htm>