[rabbitmq-discuss] Help pinpointing an error

[Tim Watson]

Jaime,

I note that the Erlang release for Debian Stable is quite old (R14A) and that a couple of important bug fixes were made in ets since then:

- OTP-9181  ETS table type ordered_set could order large integer keys                wrongly on pure 64bit platforms. This is now corrected.  
- OTP-9281  ETS tables using the ordered_set option could potentially get           into an internally inconsistent state.

So I would strongly suggest upgrading to the latest Erlang (R15). The squeeze-backports repo has an 15B version, which should do nicely to remove this from the line up of potential causes.

Cheers,
Tim

On 31 Aug 2012, at 13:26, Tim Watson wrote:

> 
> On 31 Aug 2012, at 13:18, Tim Watson wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> Is that it? It seems like you've pasted only a subset of the log file, and I'd like to know a bit more about what was happening on both nodes when this occurs. Can we see the sasl logs for both nodes too please, and the output of `rabbitmqctl report` for both nodes?
>> _
> 
> I mean for 'the node' not 'both nodes'. Also, what Erlang version are you using (what do you see when running `erl`) ?
> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120831/e9485418/attachment.htm>