[rabbitmq-discuss] Fwd: Excessive memory consumption of one server in cluster setup

[Matthias Reik]

Hi Matthias,

even though the setup looks slightly differently (since we are not using
the shovel plugin), the reason
could be the same. We are explicitly ACKing the messages (i.e. no
auto-ack), even though the consumers
are in the same data-centers (so we should have a reliable network), but if
the acks are lost and that
causes memory increase in the server then it could be the same bug.

Is there anything I could do to validate this assumption? I have provided
initial logs to Francesco.

Is there anything I can do in the meantime to get into a state where I have
a working cluster again
(currently I took our second server out from the cluster, but that's of
course a bit of a risky thing to do)

Thx for your help, appreciate a lot.

Cheers
Matthias


On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> Matthias,
>
>
> On 27/08/12 10:26, Matthias Reik wrote:
>
>> I just upgraded to 2.8.6, and I see the same effect with the latest
>> version :-(
>> (not really unexpected, since nothing was fixed in that regard in 2.8.6).
>>
>> Already after about 10 minutes server2 consumes 200% more memory than
>> server1,
>>
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> This is almost certainly the same bug as
> http://rabbitmq.1065348.n5.**nabble.com/Shovel-stops-**
> receiving-acks-from-cluster-**tp21384p21649.html<http://rabbitmq.1065348.n5.nabble.com/Shovel-stops-receiving-acks-from-cluster-tp21384p21649.html>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120827/79288a4d/attachment.htm>