[rabbitmq-discuss] Status of RabbitMQ-C

[Brendan Hay]

Thanks for clarifying, Alan.

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Alan Antonuk <alan.antonuk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi - current maintainer of the rabbitmq-c library here;
>
> I don't know the entire history behind the rabbitmq-c library, however as
> I understand the label 'experimental' has a lot to do with the fact the
> library was not given the same amount of attention as the other official
> Java, .NET and Erlang clients, and thus was not promised the same amount of
> support the other clients were given.
>
> I would give the library the label "beta" currently.
>
> The library does support the current feature set of the latest RabbitMQ
> broker (v2.8.1)
> The library has been used in limited amount of production scenarios (that
> I know about) and been shown to be stable in the cases I know about
> The API definitely needs some love, especially in the area of consuming
> messaging and dealing with asynchronous events
> Currently the library lacks good documentation and packaging
>
> -Alan
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Brendan Hay <brendan at soundcloud.com>wrote:
>
>> Yo,
>>
>> Is the rabbitmq-c library still considered experimental, if so, for what
>> reasons? (lack of functionality, lack of love, etc.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brendan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120402/efe83e58/attachment.htm>