[rabbitmq-discuss] Testing Shovel on a WAN

MELIQUE Denis (MORPHO) denis.melique at morpho.com
Mon Apr 2 09:34:36 BST 2012


Thank you Simon.

I also did some testing with federation and compared with Shovel, but not in a clustered configuration.
I have tested only Shovel with clusters. I am going to test federation as well.
For the moment, I preferred using Shovel because federation seems to be less mature.
(not yet included in VMWare support, and many support activity on this forum).
This might be change with the version 2.8.1.
Reading RabbitMQ web site, I now have the feeling that federation is going to be the 
recommended solution, for my kind of application (multi-site through a WAN)
Am I right ?

Thank's 

Denis

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon MacMullen [mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 5:13 PM
To: MELIQUE Denis (MORPHO)
Cc: rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] Testing Shovel on a WAN

On 30/03/12 15:50, MELIQUE Denis (MORPHO) wrote:
> - set a two node cluster on local end
> - Have the Shovel plug-In configured on both nodes
>    Each node has its one Shovel setting, with similar parameters except "sources [broker..]" and "destinations [broker...]",
>    That are specific to the node.

Ah, right.

So the shovel does not handle clusters specially at all; if you 
configure the shovel on two cluster nodes you will get two shovels 
running in parallel. Each message will go through one shovel or the 
other, but the order will get mixed up.

Federation is different; in a cluster each federation link will only 
exist once. I wonder if the shovel should be more like federation in 
this regard...

Cheers, Simon

-- 
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, VMware
#
" Ce courriel et les documents qui lui sont joints peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou ayant un caractère privé. S'ils ne vous sont pas destinés, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de les divulguer, de les reproduire ou d'en utiliser de quelque manière que ce soit le contenu. Si ce message vous a été transmis par erreur, merci d'en informer l'expéditeur et de supprimer immédiatement de votre système informatique ce courriel ainsi que tous les documents qui y sont attachés."
******
" This e-mail and any attached documents may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, copying of this e-mail and any attachments thereto or use of their contents by any means whatsoever is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and all attached documents from your computer system."
#


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list