[rabbitmq-discuss] Channels closed unexpectedly in Java client

[Iain Hull]

Hi Matthew,

On Thur, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:03, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> Wow - I'd not considered that file systems these days would still have
> such limits... In my own testing a little while ago, I found that JFS
> had the best performance for my hardware when running Rabbit, but I
> didn't do any huge scaling tests so I wouldn't be surprised if that
has
> even lower limits for such things.

> Certainly my testing of ext4 is not favourable. It seems to have very
> inconsistent performance. That said, if it works for you...
Ok thanks I will add xfs and jfs to my mix for testing.  Do you still 
have those results? And are they in a consumable format?  Our ops team
would be really interested in looking over them as the basis for our own
testing.

Regards,
Iain.