[rabbitmq-discuss] temp-queues in STOMP adaptor - missing subscription header

[Steve Powell]

On 10 Nov 2011, Toby Corkindale, Lionel Cons and Michael Justin wrote under the thread starting:
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/2011-November/016105.html

Yes, indeed, we are generating frames that  were valid in STOMP 1.0 but
are now invalid in STOMP 1.1.

I have raised a bug and this should be fixed in the next release.

The proposal is:
  The subscription id will be determined by the /temp-queue name used
  in the reply-to header of the SEND frame.
  This id will be documented, just in case the client wants to avoid clashes
  with other subscription ids used on her SUBSCRIBE frames.

Thank you for pointing this out.

Steve Powell  (a happy bunny)
----------some more definitions from the SPD----------
Avoirdupois phr. 'Would you like peas with that?'
Abbey adj. Quite like an Abbe.
Definite phr. 'It's hard of hearing, I think.'
Modest n. The most mod.