[rabbitmq-discuss] State monad question

[Jon Brisbin]

On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Alvaro Videla wrote:

> For what I've talked with Matthew on twitter you could do something to avoid the "staircasing" as described here:
> 
> http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/programming-with-monads.html
> 
> As you can see there, you could avoid those nested case expressions. 

Ahhh...I see said the blind man. :)

I've been reading up on Haskell lately, so that makes some modicum of sense.

Wish I understood the theory better. :/

jb


> 
> If this is a joke from Matthew I don't know. For me is a pretty cool implementation of Monads in Erlang.
> 
> Hope this helps, and I hope I understood something too :)
> 
> Alvaro
> 
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Jon Brisbin wrote:
> 
>> Saw the traffic today about the State/Cut stuff and looked at the code. But I feel like the guy who misses the joke and everyone else is laughing.
>> 
>> Can someone throw me a bone here and let me in on why the hubbub? What's the significance? Look at this as a teachable moment. ;)
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Jon Brisbin
>> 
>> http://jbrisbin.com
>> Twitter: @j_brisbin
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> 


Thanks!

Jon Brisbin

http://jbrisbin.com
Twitter: @j_brisbin


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110331/fe58fe72/attachment.htm>