[rabbitmq-discuss] State monad question
jon at jbrisbin.com
Thu Mar 31 21:51:15 BST 2011
On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Alvaro Videla wrote:
> For what I've talked with Matthew on twitter you could do something to avoid the "staircasing" as described here:
> As you can see there, you could avoid those nested case expressions.
Ahhh...I see said the blind man. :)
I've been reading up on Haskell lately, so that makes some modicum of sense.
Wish I understood the theory better. :/
> If this is a joke from Matthew I don't know. For me is a pretty cool implementation of Monads in Erlang.
> Hope this helps, and I hope I understood something too :)
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Jon Brisbin wrote:
>> Saw the traffic today about the State/Cut stuff and looked at the code. But I feel like the guy who misses the joke and everyone else is laughing.
>> Can someone throw me a bone here and let me in on why the hubbub? What's the significance? Look at this as a teachable moment. ;)
>> Jon Brisbin
>> Twitter: @j_brisbin
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss