[rabbitmq-discuss] Rabbitmq-Shovel Timer-Based Publishing Possible?

Matthias Radestock matthias at rabbitmq.com
Thu Mar 17 16:19:20 GMT 2011


Allen Kim wrote:
> I might have guessed wrongly that message is not delivered/consumed before
> transaction is committed.
> If you say the message is delivered/consumed before the transaction
> committed(unacknowledged), it is good enough for us.

Reliable publication requires use of either tx or confirm mode. The 
latter is far more efficient. The two recommendations I posted for 
handling your use case without resorting to timers or counters - one 
using tx and one using confirm - were based on the assumption that your 
use of tx was solely in order to ensure guaranteed message transmission. 
That does indeed appear to be the case.



More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list