[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ and Camel not working?
David Harrigan
dharrigan at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 17:45:13 GMT 2011
Hi,
Okay, I managed to convince the AMQP QPID camel client to talk to
RabbitMQ 2.7.0 using protocol 0-91 by doing this:
java -Dqpid.amqp.version=0-91 .......
I'm not getting any error message in my rabbit log to indicate a wrong
protocol. This just leaves two questions:
1. Is it still normal for my client to connect then be disconnected
every 5 seconds?
The answer to this is Yes - it appears that if the spring framework
DefaultMessageListenerContainer cannot recover from an error (see
below) it sleeps for 5 seconds then attempts again. That answers that
one.
2. Is this line normal?
WARN [c.c.j.DefaultJmsMessageListenerContainer] [822 ] - Setup of JMS
message listener invoker failed for destination 'banFlushQueue' -
trying to recover. Cause: The new addressing based sytanx is not
supported for AMQP 0-8/0-9 versions
No idea what this means - but since it is being thrown it causes the 5
second reconnect attempt.
-=david=-
On 14 December 2011 15:10, David Harrigan <dharrigan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I shall.
>
> Accord to this: http://qpid.apache.org/download.html the 0.12 release
> supports 0.9. That's hopeful.
>
> -=david=-
>
> On 14 December 2011 15:08, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>> On 14/12/11 15:05, David Harrigan wrote:
>>>
>>> so if I can force my client to talk using 0-91 then all should be well?
>>
>>
>> I believe so, although I'm not sure how good the 0-9-1 support is in recent
>> QPid. Do let us know if you get it working.
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Simon
>>
>> --
>> Simon MacMullen
>> RabbitMQ, VMware
>
>
>
> --
> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>
> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
>
> No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
> of electrons were inconvenienced.
--
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
"It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
of electrons were inconvenienced.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list