[rabbitmq-discuss] rabbitmq-stomp 2.5.1 does not respect the spec wrt content-type

[Lionel Cons]

Steve Powell writes:
 > Thanks for the confirmation that you included a content-length. Any
 > ideas on the proper behaviour when it is omitted?

End the frame on the first NULL.

For the record, Hiram's reply on the stomp-spec list is very clear:
http://groups.google.com/group/stomp-spec/browse_thread/thread/28b66d1fe71dbb4c

 > Further to my last note, it has just occurred to me that you are
 > suggesting that we do not add a default content-type header at
 > all. Is that it?

Correct: never add or modify a header that could be wrong.

Cheers,

Lionel