[rabbitmq-discuss] request for help!

[Alexis Richardson]

Ah, sorry, I completely misunderstood you :-(

Reviewers need to sign a reviewers' agreement which essentially covers
IPR issues when commenting to the WG on the docs.  Or you can just
comment in the public domain (eg: here) since the docs themselves are
public, open, etc.


On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Davorin Rusevljan
<davorin.rusevljan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Alexis Richardson <alexis at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>> Davorin
>>
>> In that 'recommended' draft, there are no node types.  So observable
>> behaviour is unconstrained.
>
> I was referring to xml nodes and their attributes, that are used
> inside xml files to formally define composite files, like one below:
>
>    <type name="source" class="composite" source="map" provides="source">
>      <descriptor name="amqp:source:map" code="0x00000001:0x00000208"/>
>      <field name="address" type="*" requires="address">
>        <error name="address-not-found" type="amqp-error" value="not-found"/>
>      </field>
>      <field name="dynamic" type="*" requires="lifetime-policy"/>
>      <field name="distribution-mode" type="symbol"
> requires="distribution-mode"/>
>      <field name="filter" type="filter-set"/>
>      <field name="default-outcome" type="*"/>
>      <field name="outcomes" type="symbol" multiple="true"/>
>      <field name="capabilities" type="symbol" multiple="true"/>
>    </type>
>
> While this is nice to get some idea what type source might be, it is
> definitely necessary to provide complete explanation what each xml
> node means, describe all their attributes, their possible values, and
> what they mean all together.
>
> And on my second question, how is reviewer status supposed to work?
> Where does one forward remarks and questions? Also is there some forum
> for people who would like to consider to implement amqp 1.0?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Davorin Rusevljan
> http://www.cloud208.com/
>