[rabbitmq-discuss] Acknowledging for the deletion of the message

[Irmo Manie]

Shouldn't that parameter be renamed anyway? In my opinion negative parameter
names always cause to many confusions. 'autoAck' or something similar would
be much better I reckon.

/2cents
Irmo

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:59:25AM +0530, Kshitiz Garg wrote:
> > By the way, *noAck=false* seems to propose that I want an acknowledgment
> and
> > not defer it...as *noAck=false* seems equivalent to *Ack=True* ?? please
> > confirm ...
>
> You are correct: noAck=false <=> Ack=true
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20101013/db9ab13f/attachment.htm>