Shouldn't that parameter be renamed anyway? In my opinion negative parameter names always cause to many confusions. 'autoAck' or something similar would be much better I reckon.<div><br></div><div>/2cents</div>
<div>Irmo<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Matthew Sackman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthew@rabbitmq.com">matthew@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:59:25AM +0530, Kshitiz Garg wrote:<br>
> By the way, *noAck=false* seems to propose that I want an acknowledgment and<br>
> not defer it...as *noAck=false* seems equivalent to *Ack=True* ?? please<br>
> confirm ...<br>
<br>
</div>You are correct: noAck=false <=> Ack=true<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>