[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ and Websockets
james.r.carr at gmail.com
Fri Nov 5 14:17:13 GMT 2010
I'll chime in real quick... I am an avid Socket.IO user and I love it
because it has good fallback techniques. Also I think rabbitmq
shouldn't distribute a client library but rather just support
websockets as a protocol. I keep seeing this as being quite useful
because most of the time when I use node.js to tie socket.IO and
rabbitmq together it is just a simple pass through. :)
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Marek Majkowski <majek04 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 17:47, Christian Legnitto <clegnitto at mozilla.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Marek Majkowski wrote:
>>> I'm interested in creating a websockets plugin for Rabbit.
>>> But I'm not really sure how you'd like to use it.
>>> As a thing exposed to the wild internet?
>>> Or just as another framing for AMQP?
>>> Or as a wire protocol for STOMP?
>>> (like this thing http://jmesnil.net/stomp-websocket/doc/)
>> I was thinking more like http://jmesnil.net/stomp-websocket/doc/, as that's what I have been using. Of course, the more options the merrier :-) I can't really provide erlang help, but I'm sure I can poke the WebSocket guys here at Moz to provide any assistance required on that front.
> I understand that tunneling STOMP over websockets is cool,
> but I can't imagine a good use case for that.
> For example, inside a datacentre I'd probably use just raw Stomp.
> I would be quite reluctant to expose Stomp/websockets to users
> over the internet, because of security concerns - the users will
> effectively gain almost full control of the server (via stomp protocol).
> Do you have a specific use case in mind?
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss