[rabbitmq-discuss] rabbitmq with one producer no consumer

[Darius Damalakas]

> > I think you should use some flow control. If your Rabbit has the memory
> > alerts turned on, then your producer can pick up the
> > channel.flow/active=false and stop sending until you get the active=true.
> >
> > Otherwise your sending of persistent message will eventually make Rabbit
> run
> > out of resources.
>

IMHO, If it is not possible to store big amounts of messages, that will
require storing them somewhere else. Which basically means implementing
messaging logic twice.

Is there a possibility to use a different database back-end for persisting
messages?

Darius Damalakas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100715/53472711/attachment.htm>