[rabbitmq-discuss] (how) is it intended to stream data via AMQP?

[Matthias Radestock]

james anderson wrote:
> On 2010-01-19, at 12:18 , Matthias Radestock wrote:
>> You could add an entry to the "headers" basic content property, an  
>> AMQP table which is the generic place for apps to stash k/v pairs.
> 
> yes, that was my original question.
> such a practice would be standard enough that, so long as it was an  
> additional property (for 0-9r1 property #15), a conforming server  
> would not reject the message _and_ would be required to pass it through?

I was suggesting you use the existing 'headers' property, which itself 
is a table and specifically there for application use.

Generally brokers are meant to pass through all properties unaltered.


Matthias.