[rabbitmq-discuss] (how) is it intended to stream data via AMQP?

[james anderson]

good morning;

On 2010-01-19, at 12:18 , Matthias Radestock wrote:

> James,
>
> james anderson wrote:
>> standard practice is to include such indicators in the message   
>> content body?
>
> I don't think enough people have done this to consider anything to  
> be standard practice ;)
>
> You could add an entry to the "headers" basic content property, an  
> AMQP table which is the generic place for apps to stash k/v pairs.

yes, that was my original question.
such a practice would be standard enough that, so long as it was an  
additional property (for 0-9r1 property #15), a conforming server  
would not reject the message _and_ would be required to pass it through?