[rabbitmq-discuss] Queue durability
Matthias Radestock
matthias at lshift.net
Fri Feb 26 23:17:34 GMT 2010
Tsuraan,
tsuraan wrote:
> Is the 21673 queue storage supposed to be durable?
Yes, for queues marked as durable and messages contained in them that
are marked as persistent.
> I've had systems run out of memory, invoke the OOM-killer, and nuke
> Rabbit a few times.
Do you know why your systems are running out of memory? It certainly
shouldn't be due to rabbit, if you have the memory thresholds configured
correctly.
> At some point (possibly with code up to a few weeks old), I lost the
> existence of a queue. Has this been a known issue in the past few
> weeks, or is it a known issue that rabbit isn't nuke-proof?
It should be pretty nuke proof. Matthew may be able to elaborate once
he's back from holiday next week.
You certainly shouldn't be losing entire queues, and if you do I would
at the very least expect there to be some errors in the logs. Is there
nothing of interest in the rabbit.log and rabbit-sasl.log?
Regards,
Matthias.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list