[rabbitmq-discuss] Version numbers for librabbitmq-c?

[Stuart Herbert]

Hi Tony,

On 25 Feb 2010, at 08:54, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:

> Well... in a *way* it's versioned by way of mercurial revision IDs. It'd
> *work* to refer to versions that way, but it might not be *acceptable*...
> 
> "This code requires rabbitmq-c. It has been tested most recently against
> revision ce1eaceaee94 of 25 Feb 2010 from the rabbitmq-c Mercurial
> repository."

Mmm ... I see what you're saying, but I think it'd be a bit easier for folks if we had a numbered release we can point people to.  Having numbered releases following the X.Y.Z approach will also help w/ focusing on stabilisation of the C library :)

Best regards,
Stu
--